Single chains to Cross-chain Concept Explained
Earlier, blockchains operated autonomously, each with its isolated ecosystem. Bitcoin nurtured a decentralized identity that was free from censorship in storing value.
The desire to realize blockchain versatility emerges from Ethereum’s rise and adoption of smart contract platforms. Ethereum brought the programmable blockchain that facilitates developers in bringing decentralized apps automating functions to end reliance on intermediaries.
The emergence of Layer-1 and -2 solutions led by Solana transformed the space to a multichain ecosystem. This cross-chain world, where various blockchains communicate, coexist, and interoperate, becomes necessary as the blockchain ecosystems mature.
Blockchain Networks and Underlying Narratives
Bitcoin
Bitcoin continues holding the dominant narrative as a decentralized store of value, mainly referred to as digital gold. The secure proof-of-work consensus model emphasizes security and immutability over transaction speed.
Smart Contract Platforms
Ethereum and newer chains such as Solana moved from being cryptos to enabling decentralized applications, NFTs, and decentralized finance.
Layer-2 Solutions
Networks such as Optimism and Arbitrum build on top of Ethereum to provide reduced fees and quicker transactions while still exploiting Ethereum’s security. They address numerous scalability problems while retaining compatibility with the wider Ethereum ecosystem.
Appchains
Chains like Polkadot and Cosmos unveiled this concept, where individual blockchains are customized for particular use cases. This provides customization and scalability but unveils new interoperability issues when linking the appchains to the network.
Rise of L2, L3s, and Appchains
L2 networks seek to resolve Ethereum’s scalability issues, permitting developers to develop cheaper, quicker DApps. Despite solving some L1’s bottlenecks, they establish some challenges.
The vast majority of liquidity within the L2s is inherited from Ethereum, leading to capital fragmentation. Liquidity follows attention in the crypto world, and the community drives attention.
Layer 3s build on top of L2s, adding customization for particular use cases. Their rise is ensuring further innovation while ensuring security at lower layers.
Crosschain Bridges
These protocols permit the movement of data and tokens between different blockchain networks and make interoperability a reality. In the past five years, various innovations have improved interoperability.
Protocols such as Synapse and Wormhole have facilitated cross-chain communication. Further, projects like Polkadot and Cosmos have significantly contributed to the trend.
Risks and Susceptibilities in Crosschain Bridges
Examples of high-profile incidents highlighting the dangers include:
- The Ronin hack that occurred in 2022, resulting in a loss of more than $600M. It was attributed to centralized control over the bridge’s validation mechanism.
- The Wormhole exploit in 2022, which resulted in a loss of $325M. The exploit happened after the bridge’s security was compromised, permitting attackers to mint tokens without appropriate validation.
Restaking as a Layer of Economic Incentives
Restaking aligns economic incentives across the crosschain ecosystem. Validators acquire rewards from their primary network and other protocols and chains they secure via restaking, creating a more economically sustainable model for validators.
Risks and Considerations for Restaking
Overextending staked assets across multiple chains could introduce security susceptibilities, mainly if the staked capital is inadequate to secure all the chains. Besides, restaking could concentrate validator power in the hands of a few major stakers, undermining the decentralization that PoS networks seek to attain.
Restaking’s Potential Effect on Cross-chain Fragmentation
The fragmentation of human capital and community resources is a major challenge of the crosschain world. Restaking can address the issue by combining validator activity and minimizing the need for separate security mechanisms across various chains.
Challenges of a Crosschain/Multichain Approach
Examples of risks and challenges include:
-
- Fragmentation of human capital and resources
- Scalability problems linked to more blockchain interoperation
- Security problems
- High costs linked to asset movement across various chains
Final Thoughts
Numerous obstacles should be addressed to attain the vision of a truly interoperable, multichain world. Scaling solutions like sharding must mature to support the rising demand for crosschain transactions.
To enhance adoption, crosschain solutions should prioritize usability. Over time, people might witness the consolidation of standards and protocols, allowing for more efficient communication between chains.
All trademarks, logos, and images displayed on this site belong to their respective owners and have been utilized under the Fair Use Act. The materials on this site should not be interpreted as financial advice. When we incorporate content from other sites, we ensure each author receives proper attribution by providing a link to the original content. This site might maintain financial affiliations with a selection of the brands and firms mentioned herein. As a result, we may receive compensation if our readers opt to click on these links within our content and subsequently register for the products or services on offer. However, we neither represent nor endorse these services, brands, or companies. Therefore, any disputes that may arise with the mentioned brands or companies need to be directly addressed with the respective parties involved. We urge our readers to exercise their own judgement when clicking on links within our content and ultimately signing up for any products or services. The responsibility lies solely with them. Please read our full disclaimer and terms of use policy here.